BlogBlog
Media | Blog |
7 Surprising AI Facts: What's Going On Behind the Headlines?
We present our experience to your attention

7 Surprising AI Facts: What's Going On Behind the Headlines?

Introduction: Beyond the AI Agenda

The headlines, promises, and speculation surrounding AI are endless. Every day, we encounter a new model, a new capability, or a prophecy that will revolutionize the future. But amidst the constant buzz of agendas and exaggerated expectations, we can easily lose sight of where AI is truly heading and the hidden costs of this journey. In this article, we'll delve beyond the headlines and examine seven surprising, lesser-known yet profound truths, distilled from expert analyses like the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Index 2025 Report. Prepare to understand what's happening behind the glamorous facade of AI.
 

1-Big Change: Industry Leads, Academia Absent

Gone are the days when AI research was once the preserve of university laboratories. According to Epoch AI data, the industrial sector produced 55 notable AI models in 2024. Among the models released in 2024 that reflected this trend, names like GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 stood out. In contrast, academia's contribution in this field was surprisingly zero . The driving forces behind this overwhelming superiority are giants like Google and OpenAI , both of which shared the lead with seven models each in 2024. This striking picture highlights the immense financial resources and computational power required to develop today's most advanced AI models. The balance of power in the world of research and development has radically shifted; the rules of the game are now set by large tech companies.
 

2-The Workforce's "Great Equalizer": AI Empowers Low-Skilled Workers

Contrary to the widespread belief that AI will primarily automate high-skilled, knowledge-based tasks, research suggests the opposite. Studies show that AI tools significantly increase the productivity of low-skilled workers compared to their high-skilled counterparts. For example, one customer service study observed productivity increases of up to 34% for low-skilled workers receiving AI support, while this effect was statistically insignificant for high-skilled workers. This "leveling effect" isn't unique to customer service; studies in other fields, such as consulting and software engineering, have also produced similar results, confirming AI's potential to close the skills gap. This suggests that, rather than disrupting the workforce pyramid, AI could empower less experienced workers to close the talent gap and reshape the future of work.
 

3-The Heavy Price of Progress: Million-Dollar Bills and Carbon Footprints

The cost of training the most advanced AI models has reached staggering levels. Bringing these massive digital brains to life involves not only code and data, but also multi-million dollar bills and a significant environmental burden. For example, the estimated cost of training OpenAI's groundbreaking GPT-4 model is approximately $79 million . The environmental cost of training GPT-4 is as significant as the financial cost: the estimated carbon emissions generated during training GPT-4 reach 588 tons of CO² equivalent . These enormous costs also explain why, as we saw in point 1, academia has been sidelined in AI development, leaving industry to dictate the rules of the game. The numbers concretely reveal the hidden face of the AI revolution: the enormous financial and ecological costs behind progress.
 

4-The Bottleneck of the Physical World: AI's Fate Depends on Chips

The abstract, digital world of AI is tightly connected to the very tangible and challenging realities of physical production. At the heart of this dependency are semiconductor chips. Currently, success rates in the "tape- out " process, the final stage of chip design, are at an all-time low. Efficiency issues in chips coming off the production line are also one of the biggest obstacles to the sector's growth. This bottleneck is so severe that it is expected to cause delays in the supply of laptops, servers, and other essential IT equipment even by 2025.

The market is almost entirely dominated by a single player: TSMC, which commands 62% of the global semiconductor market by 2024 and is struggling to meet the high demand, particularly for AI applications. This demonstrates how dependent the future of AI is on the production capacity of a few factories and the immense pressure placed on chip engineers. Electronic Nation The words of an engineer in the documentary Memoirs perfectly summarise this stress:
"For two or three months after each chip tape- out, I was constantly anxious and sleepless. I was constantly wondering what could be wrong... When the chip came back and I pressed RESET for the first time , I was incredibly nervous. The moment I released RESET was the moment that determined heaven or hell."
 

5-The Paradox of Bias: Even "Neutral" AIs Carry Hidden Biases

AI developers are making significant efforts to reduce bias in their models. The most advanced models, such as GPT-4 and Claude 3, include mechanisms specifically designed for this purpose. However, research shows that even when these models avoid overtly biased statements, they still exhibit deeply ingrained "implicit biases." For example, these AIs may disproportionately associate negative terms with certain demographic groups. Gender stereotypes also persist: models tend to associate women with the humanities rather than STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) fields, and men with leadership roles. This demonstrates that achieving fairness and impartiality in AI is a much more complex and deeply philosophical problem than simple technical tweaks.
 

6-Global Mood Shift: World Divided on AI

Optimism about the future of AI is far from a global consensus. Polls conducted by Ipsos reveal deep regional divisions on this issue. On the one hand, there are countries enthusiastic about the technology: 83% of the public in China, 80% in Indonesia, and 77% in Thailand see AI as a force that will do more good than harm. On the other, a more skeptical view prevails. This figure drops to just 40% in Canada, 39% in the US, and 36% in the Netherlands. This sharp divide demonstrates that AI adoption is not just a technological process; it is also closely linked to cultural values, societal trust, and geopolitical dynamics.
 

7-The Dark Side of Artificial Intelligence: Escalating Incidents and the Human Cost

As AI technology becomes more widespread, the number of adverse events it causes is increasing alarmingly. According to the AI Incident Database , the number of AI-related incidents reported in 2024 reached a record high of 233. Behind these statistics lie tragic human stories. Here are two striking examples:
  • A 14-year-old boy committed suicide after allegedly interacting with a chatbot for extended periods of time, giving him harmful advice. His family filed a lawsuit alleging the bot's role in the incident.
  • In 2006, the identity and graduation photo of a murdered high school student were used to create a chatbot character without the family's permission, reliving trauma for the family.
These cases are concrete evidence of the profound human suffering and ethical violations that can result from the uncontrolled and irresponsible use of artificial intelligence technologies.
 

Conclusion: The Hidden Costs of a Glamorous Future

These seven points demonstrate that AI isn't just a technological revolution of algorithms and processing power. Rather, we're facing a multilayered phenomenon with complex social, economic, environmental, and ethical implications. Billions of dollars in costs and chip supply bottlenecks act as the " physical and financial gatekeepers " of this revolution, inevitably concentrating power in the hands of large industrial players. This concentration of power shapes a multitude of dynamics, from the "leveling" effect on the workforce to the paradoxes of hidden bias. Add to this the diverse global responses and the human tragedies caused by technology, and it's clear that the path ahead must be tread carefully. The critical question we must ask ourselves is: "As we race to build ever more powerful AIs, are we paying sufficient attention to these hidden costs and complex realities shaping our future?"